This is the intro of the Complex Component Design series. Here are the posts in the series:
The title would probably better be “Somewhat Complex Component Design in Ember.js” but any title including ‘Somewhat’ rules out pompousness. I therefore don’t claim that the series of blog posts I intend to start here will represent the pinnacle of component design in Ember. There definitely are and definitely will be more complex component structures and scenarios.
The component developed in the series is one that autocompletes as the user starts to write the input and allows selecting from a fixed set of options. Nothing extraordinary but complex enough so that the design/interaction principles can be applied and explained while developing the component.
Important disclaimer: I am not an expert on component design (which, it seems to me, is quite a complex topic). I got intrigued by it thanks to Ryan Florence and his talks and learned most of the basics from him. My choice of component probably also has to do something with Ryan. He developed the ic-autocomplete component from which I took several ideas, sometimes simply copying the implementation.
So you probably ask: why reinvent the wheel? Why develop something that is already done and not something new?
First of all, I (and science says most of us) learn best by doing. I wanted to use an example where I already have a sample implementation but also understand why the original implementation did things as it did and see whether I can make the component simpler or more robust. I wanted to face the problems, to feel the pain of doing things a certain way, and find solutions for typical, recurring problems.
It’s also important to remember that when Ryan developed their autocomplete component, there were no block parameters, no closure actions and no direct attribute bindings. One still had to resort to observers in several cases. Two-way bindings were still in, and the de-facto way of communication between pieces of a component structure.
Ember has come a long way since then and its components converged toward those of React in its reactive, “rerender everything” approach. Potentially some of the ideas explained in the series can be applied to React and other libraries, too, and thus might prove useful to more people.
To have something (almost) tangible in this first intro post, too, let me show you how one would interact with the finished(?) component. If you have read my earlier posts or my book, it will come as no surprise that I use it here to select a great musician from a defined set of them:
This short intro and the demo have hopefully whetted your appetite and you’ll join me for the next part of the series: